Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337)

The RR diagrams you linked to are very complex and, as you say, solve a different problem than we are discussing here. The RR diagram I posted is very simple and contains the same information as in your table plus information on optionality of elements. Do you have an idea of how to convey that optionality information in your table? That was what I was getting at with the graphical representation, but I think the RR diagram does it much better. 

Whether we use the RR diagram or a version of that table or something else, I would like to suggest that this issue be brought to a conclusion by posting _something_ in the standard to give readers and easy way to understand the syntax of URLs.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/337#issuecomment-421635952