Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG Review Request: User Activation API (#300)

Hey @dtapuska, 

We did read your explainer; the feature detection snippet is great. I think there are a few open questions:

 * The motivation doesn't identify why it's good or necessary to add this API. The iframe activation case is interesting, but there's no example code showing how this will make a difficult or error-prone solution today more usable or less error-prone in the future.
 * In general, IDL is for specs, example code is for humans (and Explainers).
 * It isn't clear who sets `includeUserActivation` and how/when. As there isn't any example code, it's hard to suss out what's intended.

Thanks for following up on this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/300#issuecomment-420336667

Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:33:22 UTC