- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:18:10 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2018 03:18:33 UTC
@domenic, you know I love you, but... > I don't think ReSpec specs have a notion of "exporting a definition", We are working with @plinss to get Shepherd integration. We are all busy people tho, and these things take time. > or of stability over time in general. That's unfair and uncalled for (and demonstratively false!). ReSpec has been used for longer than BikeShed and it's actively maintained and quite stable. In particular, folks here could tell you that I always respond promptly and work speedily to fix any issues that arise. Please refrain from 💩ing on ReSpec - as BS has its own set of problems (no software is perfect - and ReSpec and BikeShed serve different needs/communities). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/688#issuecomment-420133010
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2018 03:18:33 UTC