Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG Review Request: RTCIceTransport & RTCQuicTransport (#296)

+1 on @martinthomson's comment that it is premature to ship a derivative spec without a more fundamental discussion in the IETF first.

I do appreciate the interest in QUIC and the desire to move fast, but that discussion needs to happen after we ship the first standard version of QUIC (likely by end of the year.) The IETF WG is 100% focused on ironing out the final design nits and interop issues, and taking time away from that will not be the right decision for us at the moment.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/296#issuecomment-418599674

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2018 04:59:05 UTC