- From: Oriol Brufau <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 04:45:21 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/286@github.com>
Hello TAGļ¼ I'm requesting a TAG review of: - Name: CSS Logical Properties and Values Level 1, except [features not ready for shipping according to spec editors](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical-1/#issue-b84049ec). - Specification URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical-1/ - Explainer, Requirements Doc, or Example code: https://docs.google.com/document/d/111ol5b6BHHIiQyOzybs8PVjn0MqKvyFzP-fwGC5-fuA/edit#heading=h.5hghvy5jlwvp - Tests: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/css-logical (more tests need to be added). - Primary contacts: @Loirooriol, @mrego You should also know that... Firefox already shipped most of the logical properties and values: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0040.html Blink also implemented various logical properties, but mostly with a `-webkit-` prefix. The intent to implement and ship is https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/48OwfwZrbvI According to @fantasai, > We haven't had TAG review specifically, but i18n reviewed it ages ago. > HTML also has a dependency on these properties for the UA style sheet: they were necessary to implement HTML default styling in a world where writing-mode exists, so both the WHATWG and W3C specs rely on it. > CSSWG cleared it for shipping when Firefox brought up the issue awhile back. You can't ship writing-mode for the Web without this feature. More info in the FPWD announcement at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0043.html We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one): - [X] open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback - [ ] open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames] -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/286
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2018 11:45:46 UTC