Re: [heycam/webidl] iterable's should have more than just forEach() (#561)

This has come up a few times.

Realistically, this is why I supported `[ArrayClass]`: you get all the generic array things for free....  Anyway, we could have iterable declarations pull in `Array.prototype.find` onto the relevant prototype and that would work fine, I think.  And we could do similar for others, and keep whacking the moles as ES gets updated.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/561#issuecomment-392798748