- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 09:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 09:54:35 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request. > + * interesting test: "Content-Type: text/plain;" --> + + <dt>`<code><a href=http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/client-hints.html#dpr>DPR</a></code>` + <dt>`<code><a href=http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/client-hints.html#downlink>Downlink</a></code>` + <dt>`<code><a href=http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/client-hints.html#save-data>Save-Data</a></code>` + <dt>`<code><a href=http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/client-hints.html#viewport-width>Viewport-Width</a></code>` + <dt>`<code><a href=http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/client-hints.html#width>Width</a></code>` + <dd><p>If <var>value</var>, <a lt="extract header values">once extracted</a>, is failure, then + return false. + + <dt>Otherwise + <dd><p>Return false. + </dl> + + <li><p>If <var>value</var>'s <a for="byte sequence">length</a> is greater than 128, then return + false. Yeah, if we keep adding headers to this safelist that would indeed become a concern. Otherwise I was thinking that a low enough individual limit would make that unneeded. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/736#discussion_r190845942
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 09:54:35 UTC