- From: =JeffH <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 16:19:35 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2018 23:19:59 UTC
In [this comment on wicg.discourse.io](https://discourse.wicg.io/t/relationship-of-permissions-feature-policy-origin-policy/2772/2) @jyasskin notes: > I believe we’re hoping for Feature Policy and Permissions to refer to a shared list of [Permission Names](https://w3c.github.io/permissions/#enumdef-permissionname) / [feature-identifiers](https://wicg.github.io/feature-policy/#feature-identifier) [values](https://github.com/WICG/feature-policy/blob/gh-pages/features.md). I believe all permissions should also be controllable with a feature policy. Am submitting this because I do not see an issue here for it and [Permission Names](https://w3c.github.io/permissions/#enumdef-permissionname) / [feature-identifier values](https://github.com/WICG/feature-policy/blob/gh-pages/features.md) are separate, intersecting, but not congruent (and it seems unclear if they are supposed to be congurent). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/177
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2018 23:19:59 UTC