- From: =JeffH <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 15:12:48 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/176@github.com>
Over in wicg.discourse.io, [ian_clelland writes in response](https://discourse.wicg.io/t/relationship-of-permissions-feature-policy-origin-policy/2772/3?u=equalsjeffh-pp) to [a query regarding the relationship between Permissions and Feature Policy](https://discourse.wicg.io/t/relationship-of-permissions-feature-policy-origin-policy/2772?u=equalsjeffh-pp): > Fundamentally, [Permissions](https://w3c.github.io/permissions/) is about the user, while [Feature Policy](https://wicg.github.io/feature-policy/) is about the web developer / site owner. > The Permissions API provides a method for pages to request permission from the user for certain APIs. If the page is allowed to request permission, then the user can choose to grant / deny. > Feature policy lets developers control which pages/frames are allowed to request permission. By default, scripts running in top-level pages (not inside of <iframes>) have the ability to request permissions from the user, while cross-origin pages in frames are not allowed to request permissions. I made [the query](https://discourse.wicg.io/t/relationship-of-permissions-feature-policy-origin-policy/2772?u=equalsjeffh-pp) because the above, to me at least, is not clear in the Permissions spec. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/176
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2018 22:13:10 UTC