- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 06:15:10 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 13:15:37 UTC
If we think https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-323006020 is no longer a problem (do we have data?), then it feels like `skipWaiting()` should resolve once the service worker moves from `.waiting` to `.active`. At this point it's in the "activating" state, I don't think it needs to wait for "activated". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-398394573
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 13:15:37 UTC