- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:25:23 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 22:25:48 UTC
Resolving it once the service worker moves from `.waiting` to `.active` would be good for the `skipWaiting()`'s semantic if we could. But I still don't see any good way to avoid the deadlock in https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-323006020. The service worker's install handlers have to wait until the `waitUntil(skipWaiting())` promises resolve to become a waiting worker. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-398565633
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 22:25:48 UTC