- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:22:20 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 15:27:07 UTC
>From an implementation point of view I'm a little uneasy overloading `FetchEvent.clientId` to mean both: * If a subresource requests, then this is the client that determines all permissions, CSP, referrer policy, etc. * If a non-subresource requests, then this is the client that started it, but it doesn't set any policy on this request. Its just a bit non-ideal to try to use the same information for policy in one case, but exempt it from that policy in others. But maybe thats an implementation specific concern. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1267#issuecomment-361965084
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 15:27:07 UTC