- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:55:31 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 15:56:23 UTC
I kind of like the simplicity of clientId just being empty/null for all navigations. Do we know if people are really asking for a non-empty clientId for these cases? We might just save ourselves time/complexity by sticking with empty/null. The big use case I'm hearing for the new clientId stuff is to implement resultingClientId, so you can track the whole page load (main resource + its subresources). I guess Workers are an interesting point, though. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1267#issuecomment-361976488
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 15:56:23 UTC