- From: Alex Russell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 02:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 9 February 2018 02:30:43 UTC
Sorry for the slow response. Was discussing with others on another team here, as well as @jungkees. I can imagine a few extensions that would address the full range of issues I'm seeing: 1.) An extension for controlled scopes that marks them as "pathComponent" matches to solve the `/` issue. This might be an option to registrations. 2.) An extension that marks scopes as "exact"; not matching `/foo/*` when you only mean to handle `/foo`. How this and the first intersect is an interesting question. 3.) An extension for auxiliary scopes (as previously discussed, but I can't recall where. These might come together like: ```html <html> <script> navigator.serviceWorker.register("/sw.js", { scope: "/thinger", exact: true }).then(...); </script> </html>``` ```js // sw.js self.onactivate = (e) => { // Auxiliaries don't affect the registration e.addAuxiliaryScope({ // handle all navigations to `/whatevs/*` but not `/whatevslol` (e.g.) scope: "/whatevs", pathComponent: true }); // ... };``` Thoughts? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1272#issuecomment-364316574
Received on Friday, 9 February 2018 02:30:43 UTC