- From: Alex Russell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 02:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 9 February 2018 02:30:43 UTC
Sorry for the slow response. Was discussing with others on another team here, as well as @jungkees. I can imagine a few extensions that would address the full range of issues I'm seeing:
1.) An extension for controlled scopes that marks them as "pathComponent" matches to solve the `/` issue. This might be an option to registrations.
2.) An extension that marks scopes as "exact"; not matching `/foo/*` when you only mean to handle `/foo`. How this and the first intersect is an interesting question.
3.) An extension for auxiliary scopes (as previously discussed, but I can't recall where.
These might come together like:
```html
<html>
<script>
navigator.serviceWorker.register("/sw.js", {
scope: "/thinger",
exact: true
}).then(...);
</script>
</html>```
```js
// sw.js
self.onactivate = (e) => {
// Auxiliaries don't affect the registration
e.addAuxiliaryScope({
// handle all navigations to `/whatevs/*` but not `/whatevslol` (e.g.)
scope: "/whatevs",
pathComponent: true
});
// ...
};```
Thoughts?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1272#issuecomment-364316574
Received on Friday, 9 February 2018 02:30:43 UTC