- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 08:41:07 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2018 08:42:26 UTC
> But the issue I'm talking about here means that "scope" as a concept is fundamentally broken. I think this might be correct. Scopes were never a universally popular thing. I'd still like to consider the other big use cases before making a quick decision here that could limit what we do later or end up adding more complexity. Interestingly, it looks like this was considered in issue 3: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/3. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1272#issuecomment-364040571
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2018 08:42:26 UTC