- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:02:28 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2018 08:02:52 UTC
I understand the use case but I'm a bit reluctant to add intelligence/exceptions to the scope-matching algorithm. It could conceivably break some assumptions in code if suddenly document URL can be shorter than the scope. I agree the real solution is to do maps.google.com, or as a workaround can they claim all of "maps*" (i.e., move mapsearch somewhere else?) Another workaround is two service workers: one at maps and one at maps/, and have maps redirect to maps/ (though that will incur two service worker startup costs). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1272#issuecomment-364031857
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2018 08:02:52 UTC