Re: [heycam/webidl] Standardize around typography of IDL true/false/null (#457)

@tobie The main consideration in not marking up "ECMAScript booleans" as different from "IDL booleans" is https://github.com/whatwg/infra/issues/95. I expect Infra to eventually define booleans in a similar way to Infra lists (which is explicitly stated to be equivalent to ECMAScript Lists):

> Whenever JavaScript expects a List, a list as defined here can be used; they are the same type.

If that happens, IDL booleans will be the same things as ECMAScript booleans (which makes sense), both of which are going to be mapped directly to Infra booleans.

Also, the ECMAScript-based pieces in HTML don't capitalize "true", "false", "null", or even "undefined" at all. See e.g. [The `WindowProxy` exotic object](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/window-object.html#the-windowproxy-exotic-object).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/457#issuecomment-337266602