Re: [heycam/webidl] Standardize around typography of IDL true/false/null (#457)

> The main consideration in not marking up "ECMAScript booleans" as different from "IDL booleans" is whatwg/infra#95. I expect Infra to eventually define booleans in a similar way to Infra lists (which is explicitly stated to be equivalent to ECMAScript Lists):

Can we wait for those until that's clarified in infra?

> Also, the ECMAScript-based pieces in HTML don't capitalize "true", "false", "null", or even "undefined" at all. See e.g. The WindowProxy exotic object.

s/capitalize/markup/ ? If so, I see what you mean. But it still seems bizarre to create our own flavor of ES markup, while style relying on the same tags the ES spec is using.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/457#issuecomment-337277595