Re: [heycam/webidl] Dot notation for dictionary members is not spec'ed. (#453) from Marcos Cáceres on 2017-10-03 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from October 2017)

From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 15:38:19 +0000 (UTC)
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/453/333882164@github.com>

Then I’m a bit 🤷‍♂️. This is used in prose, so I’d rather use dot notation if it’s not harmful (as it makes some things a little more compact). Otherwise, I’m happy to just use “dictionary’s member”. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/453#issuecomment-333882164

Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2017 15:43:28 UTC