Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG Review of HTML 5.2 (previously 5.1) (#119)

@plinss:

> Yes, […] `dfn` should be allowed in flow content, especially since the HTML spec itself uses them in headings, see https://w3c.github.io/html/infrastructure.html#section-transferable-objects for an example

`dfn` is used in that example as phrasing content - **within** the flow content. That is legitimate. What would be a violation of the current spec is

```<dfn><h4>special treatment</h4></dfn>```

On a separate note, the semantics I see in real use don't match what the spec says, and I will file an issue for that.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/119#issuecomment-304354423