- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 01:21:51 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 15 May 2017 08:22:25 UTC
>From the implementor's perspective, if we remove *suppressing* for slots removal, the engine will need to do an additional check (and additional potential slotchange event firing). Unless there is a good use case for slotchange for "slot removal", it might be better to suppress it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/447#issuecomment-301408560
Received on Monday, 15 May 2017 08:22:25 UTC