- From: Russell Bicknell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 12:31:30 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 15 May 2017 19:32:08 UTC
> should we keep suppressing for removal slots or should we just remove the concept of suppressing altogether? IMHO, it's better to have the same behavior in all cases: "If the nodes distributed to the slot changed, then 'slotchange' fires." I don't think the inconsistency introduced by adding the special case "However, if the nodes distributed to a slot changed because that slot was removed from a tree, then 'slotchange' does not fire." is justified by avoiding the performance cost of an extra event. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/447#issuecomment-301579483
Received on Monday, 15 May 2017 19:32:08 UTC