- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 18:43:45 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 13 May 2017 01:44:17 UTC
> > There is a discussion for private states in ECMAScript on track, and we've been discussing about the fully isolated components for years now. > > I think the same point as for C++ and Java applies. It's not a 'thing' as far is the user is concerned. Go wild. Well, then that same argument holds for closed shadow trees. It's not really a thing to go into some component's shadow tree and mess with it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/640#issuecomment-301217856
Received on Saturday, 13 May 2017 01:44:17 UTC