- From: Matthew Ryan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 17:13:00 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 13 May 2017 00:13:32 UTC
> Would you argue that private variables in languages like C++ and Java are limitations that prevent useful programs to be written because other code can't access those states and implement useful programs? I would argue that a user can't interactively render a collection of private variables, nor pass it to a program, expecting it to act upon their mental model of that rendering. > Or would you argue that the canvas is a limitation because it won't allow the same library to provide keyboard shortcuts into text drawn in the canvas? It's an image. At a facile level, if you're not using document objects to render your content, then you have nothing to do with the DOM, and the DOM has nothing to do with you. This sucks for all planned or unplanned external interactivity, but it shouldn't be a consideration for this discussion. > There is a discussion for private states in ECMAScript on track, and we've been discussing about the fully isolated components for years now. I think the same point as for C++ and Java applies. It's not a 'thing' as far is the user is concerned. Go wild. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/640#issuecomment-301211816
Received on Saturday, 13 May 2017 00:13:32 UTC