Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should clients.claim() control reserved Clients? (#1090) from Ben Kelly on 2017-03-23 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from March 2017)

From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:14:53 -0700
To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1090/288597120@github.com>

I mean that skipWaiting() must update the controller on the reserved Client.  Either the reserved Client gets SW1 and then upgraded to SW2 on skipWaiting(), or it comes in a bit later and just gets SW2.

Why do you think the skipWaiting() would not operate on the reserved Client?  It should not depend on the URL of the Client, but simply replace the Clients controlled by SW1.  That should be a known list.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1090#issuecomment-288597120

Received on Thursday, 23 March 2017 02:15:27 UTC