Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should clients.claim() control reserved Clients? (#1090)

I found the point where we misunderstood each other.

> I mean that skipWaiting() must update the controller on the reserved Client.

To my understanding `skipWaiting()` doesn't update the controller of any client. What it does is just promoting it to active. And it's the `claim()`'s role that forcibly applies the updated controller to the clients without involving a navigation.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1090#issuecomment-288598046

Received on Thursday, 23 March 2017 02:22:06 UTC