- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:54:49 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 08:55:24 UTC
@tabatkins an iterable that is a value iterator rather than a pair iterator does so indeed. My recollection is that we only added that for legacy classes that we could not convert to arrays or subclasses of arrays. (I have filed bugs to make it clearer in IDL what is recommended and what is not, but there's a huge backlog...) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/291#issuecomment-283900390
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 08:55:24 UTC