- From: Gordon P. Hemsley <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 23:30:15 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 3 June 2017 06:30:48 UTC
The term "forbidden host code point" is used exactly twice within this spec, and in one case it excludes U+0025 (%): > If asciiDomain contains a forbidden host code point, validation error, return failure. > If input contains a forbidden host code point excluding U+0025 (%), validation error, return failure. I think it is easier for implementations to add to a definition rather than take away from it, so I propose removing U+0025 from the definition and special-casing it where it is _included_: > If asciiDomain contains a forbidden host code point or U+0025 (%), validation error, return failure. > If input contains a forbidden host code point, validation error, return failure. Or else creating a second definition that relates to the existing one. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/319
Received on Saturday, 3 June 2017 06:30:48 UTC