- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:20:17 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/459/review/41834074@github.com>
domenic commented on this pull request. I can merge this and check any editorial things, but I would like @rniwa to review the normative contents and the tests. > <ol> <li><p>Let <var>slotables</var> be the result of <a>finding slotables</a> for <var>slot</var>. - <li><p>If <var>suppress signaling flag</var> is unset, and <var>slotables</var> and - <var>slot</var>'s <a for=slot>assigned nodes</a> are not identical, then run - <a>signal a slot change</a> for <var>slot</var>. + <li><p>If <var>slotables</var> and <var>slot</var>'s <a for=slot>assigned + nodes</a> are not identical, then run <a>signal a slot change</a> for <var>slot</var>. I notice that this instance of "signal a slot change" has fewer checks before it than the other two. Is that correct? (I don't understand the algorithms that well so I am just pattern-matching in the hopes of finding something useful :) > <ol> <li><p>Let <var>slotables</var> be the result of <a>finding slotables</a> for <var>slot</var>. - <li><p>If <var>suppress signaling flag</var> is unset, and <var>slotables</var> and - <var>slot</var>'s <a for=slot>assigned nodes</a> are not identical, then run - <a>signal a slot change</a> for <var>slot</var>. + <li><p>If <var>slotables</var> and <var>slot</var>'s <a for=slot>assigned + nodes</a> are not identical, then run <a>signal a slot change</a> for <var>slot</var>. Nit: annevk prefers tags all on one line in his specs, so no linebreak in the middle of an `<a>stuff stuff</a>`. So the whole `<a for=slot>assigned nodes</a>` should get pushed to the next line. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/459#pullrequestreview-41834074
Received on Friday, 2 June 2017 17:20:53 UTC