- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 22:51:31 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 5 June 2017 05:52:03 UTC
hayatoito commented on this pull request. > <ol> <li><p>Let <var>slotables</var> be the result of <a>finding slotables</a> for <var>slot</var>. - <li><p>If <var>suppress signaling flag</var> is unset, and <var>slotables</var> and - <var>slot</var>'s <a for=slot>assigned nodes</a> are not identical, then run - <a>signal a slot change</a> for <var>slot</var>. + <li><p>If <var>slotables</var> and <var>slot</var>'s <a for=slot>assigned + nodes</a> are not identical, then run <a>signal a slot change</a> for <var>slot</var>. Yes, that is correct and intentional. - For assigned nodes' changes, the condition became relaxed. - For other cases (aka fallback contents), the condition become more tight. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/459#discussion_r120045273
Received on Monday, 5 June 2017 05:52:03 UTC