Re: [heycam/webidl] Add the symbol type (#377)

> It does allow editors to add

No it doesn't. It would have to be an `attribute` or `readonly attribute`. Which is indeed unusual, but I don't think it's something we should have special rules for.

If we want to allow `Foo.bar` for similar purposes as `Symbol.iterator`, we'll need a lot more work, as we won't want those to be getters---we'll want them to be data properties.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/377#issuecomment-319076422