Re: [heycam/webidl] Add the symbol type (#377)

> No it doesn't. It would have to be an attribute or readonly attribute. Which is indeed unusual, but I don't think it's something we should have special rules for.

Yeah, that's what I meant. Sorry for the sloppy WebIDL snippet.

 > If we want to allow Foo.bar for similar purposes as Symbol.iterator, we'll need a lot more work, as we won't want those to be getters---we'll want them to be data properties.

Oh… I hadn't thought about this.

So I guess we're good, then?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/377#issuecomment-319081366