Re: [whatwg/streams] Mark promise rejections for "state promises" as handled (#607)

@tyoshino I already had this conversation inside my head. Maybe I should have mentioned it to someone else. Anyway, I came to the same conclusion that you did: that it's important to do the steps in the same order and granularity as the standard, even if it sometimes makes the reference implementation a bit unnatural.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/607#issuecomment-270852452