- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:25:56 -0800
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/154@github.com>
Hello TAG! I'm requesting a TAG review of: - Name: The new "allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation" `<iframe sandbox>` flag - Specification URL: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/2292 - Explainer, Requirements Doc, or Example code: see https://github.com/WICG/interventions/issues/42 for some background, and note how the proposal morphed from initially changing the behavior of allow-top-navigation to introducing a new keyword, allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation - Primary contacts: @domenic, @lubin2010 Further details (optional): - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: Chrome is hoping to ship this in a branch that will branch March 2, so any feedback before then would be helpful. - [x] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). Although this touches on related areas, it's largely a strengthening of the isolation that was present before (with allow-top-navigation), and none of the questions seem directly relevant. - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one): - [ ] open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback - [x] open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review (preferably comment on https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/2292) - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames] -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/154
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 00:27:29 UTC