- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:24:13 -0800
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2017 23:24:47 UTC
Per request by @cynthia over on https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/154 - an attempt to clarify the role of upgrade transactions. The previous "upgrade transactions" section was full of redundant non-normative text but not called out as such. Rework, remove some of the redundancy, and frame it with succinct snippets. Hopefully this improved things: @cynthia - can you review? You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/155 -- Commit Summary -- * WIP * Clarify upgrade transactions with non-normative note -- File Changes -- M index.bs (55) M index.html (793) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/155.patch https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/155.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/155
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2017 23:24:47 UTC