Re: [whatwg/url] Document, possibly standardize, "plus" scheme convention (#230)

@annevk I understand your desire not to complicate the parser even more. The most I can hope for is someone to make a small note of the plus-convention for delineating multiple protocols/schemes. But to be clear, you can't "just use `//`". Whether or not a URL can have a `//` is defined on a per-scheme basis. `file:///x/y/z` is valid, whereas `mailto://x@y.z` is not.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/230#issuecomment-278603125