Re: [heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486)

> That kind of separation, which is already aligned with Web IDL's goals, feels better than these complex layering diagrams---which don't account for how ES would be a peer to URL and friends, in how they depend on Web IDL.

Yeah. Can't really show the direct IDL —> ES stdlib link, but bringing the ES stdlib at the bottom helps clarify this:

```
               Infra
             /         \
      IDL (core)       ES6 (core) --------------------
      /      \         /                               \
      |     IDL (core bindings) --------------          |
      |             |                          \        |
      |             |                           \       |
  IDL (extended)    |                            \      |
       \            |                             \     |
        IDL (extended bindings)   <—>  HTML        \    |
                              \        /            \   |
                            Web specifications      ES6 (stdlib)
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486#issuecomment-349718332