Re: [heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486)

I think it's best if we solve these on a case-by-case basis, since I think you'll find that we want platform objects to conform to what TC39 considers best practice. There might be some exceptions where it's hard to change things around, but I think it's hard to give high-level statements about any of this. Once we've done the work of increasing the coverage of IDL to include what ECMAScript needs it'll be much clearer what a better organization would be.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486#issuecomment-349890878