Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485)

> So presumably this just means some syntax similar to the getter/setter syntax, but details TBD?

Yes, to go crazy with this combined with the above suggestions, it could be something like
```
class X {
  get y() : Type;
  set y(arg : Type);
}
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-349447618