Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485)

So one problem with the get/set proposal is the number of random tokens in there that aren't actually needed to communicate information (e.g. the parens).  ES has them to make getters/setters look like other functions (e.g. nothing keeps you from defining a setter that takes some number of arguments in ES).

On the bright side, this proposal would make it simple to create getters/setters where the type differs, which people have wanted a few times.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-349453956