Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Web Payments Working Group Specifications (#152)

So I've been bad about getting to this review in a timely manner.

However, I did take a look at the Basic Card Payment spec today, and have a few initial comments that aren't concrete enough to turn into github issues (in addition to the two filed above):

I think the idea of [linking to](https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-methods-card/#dfn-supportednetworks) and maintaining a [separate registry](https://www.w3.org/Payments/card-network-ids) of approved card network identifiers that's separate from the specification seems like a good thing.  I'm not sure that the W3C has a lot of experience doing this sort of list/registry, though.  I wonder if they should be a little more centralized within W3C so that W3C itself can keep track of them better if, e.g., the working group in question goes out of existence.

Regarding billingAddress -- I'm curious if there's good practice on whether optional fields in dictionaries should, by convention, be nullable.  I don't actually know.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/152#issuecomment-293182737