Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447)

@stuartpb 

> Doesn't XHR already go through a HEADERS_RECEIVED state, which is what I patterned this distinction off of?

Huh, maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're asking for. I thought "responding with headers" would be between sending the response and receiving headers.

> I'd notch that as a flaw in the signal model

I think it's the major benefit of the signal model 😢. If you want to know the outcome, that's what the observer is for.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-292785225