Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447)

@annevk 

> I think we already expose the difference for opaque responses. Due to `fetch()` vs the load event. 

I think that's different to what @stuartpb is proposing. `fetch` resolves once headers have been received, but I think @stuartpb wants "responding with headers" to mean something after making the request but before headers have been received.

Although, does XHR already sorta expose this via upload progress events?

> Where is the latest proposal hosted?

Still the comment at https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-281731850. I'll start getting a PR together based on @mikewest's work.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-292784955

Received on Sunday, 9 April 2017 13:11:41 UTC