- From: Tobie Langel <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:22:15 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2016 07:22:44 UTC
> The type distinguishing table looks particularly fancy now! Thanks! I'm particularly proud of that one. Especially given how much I like CSS. > For the highlighted informal syntax examples, it would be nice to italicise or somehow otherwise distinguish the "not actual syntax replaced bits" other than the bit being pointed out. So I had noticed the italicised bits in the previous version, but thought it was (light) language highlighting. Sounds like I got that wrong. Happy to add those back in. I gave it a try just using CSS like so: ```css .syntax .n, .syntax .nv { font-style: italic; } ``` Here's what it looks like: http://rawgit.com/tobie/webidl/italics/index.html#idl-interfaces Either way, this can be added post-merge. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/158#issuecomment-245196906
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2016 07:22:44 UTC