- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:57:36 -0700
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:58:06 UTC
Given that no browser implements gb18030 like that I don't see why we should change this. We could easily break those relying on these bytes mapping to PUA. I'm also somewhat reluctant to add a note, since as far as I can tell this is just someone's opinion and those maintaining gb18030 have not decided to care. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/27#issuecomment-245016586
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:58:06 UTC