- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:33:35 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 00:34:06 UTC
One risk here for v1 is that we have `customElements.get` and if we're adding a new `get` method that returns the name given a constructor, then we'll have `customElements.get` and `customElement.getName` (or some other name) which would be quite inconsistent. Alternatively, we can make `get` return a name or a constructor based on argument but that seems rather odd. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/566#issuecomment-251837910
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 00:34:06 UTC