Re: [whatwg/streams] Note about underlyingSink close() method is misleading (#617)

> The guiding goal behind the current setup is roughly that you should only have to implement cleanup logic in one place.

I agree this is an important point and analogy with the finally clause makes me also rethink it carefully.

----

@ricea Does your proposal https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/617#issuecomment-262220474 imply removal of the fallback? It's replaced with allowing developers to make shutdown no-op, and ignore the first argument `why` and do one common thing in destroy()?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/617#issuecomment-262723092