Re: [whatwg/streams] Note about underlyingSink close() method is misleading (#617)

I agree with making us.write() and us.close() non-interruptible. It gains us the guarantee that no two methods on the underlying sink are ever called simultaneously, which is very easy to understand and work with.

The temporary loss of functionality is unfortunate, but I think it's acceptable given that we have a clear path towards making write() interruptible again in future.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/617#issuecomment-262720113