- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:24:26 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 21:25:03 UTC
domenic commented on this pull request. The port looks good, thanks. I think we should have these in separate files. E.g. piping/pipe-through.js for the duck-typed one, and piping/transform-streams.js for the others. That way people who are implementing in a staged manner (e.g. first pipeTo, then pipeThrough, then transform streams) can pass all the tests in a file at once. As for the disabled test... either way. I guess you'd want to check desired size, instead of enqueue() return values. It might also be good to minimize the number of timers involved as they make things rather fragile. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/603#pullrequestreview-7508351
Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 21:25:03 UTC