- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:46:13 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 16:46:44 UTC
> This looks great to me, although it is one of the cases where having @bzbarsky and/or @heycam weigh in would be helpful. This change is fine by me. I said so in the two issues this PR is claiming to fix. ;) As far as tests go, there's stuff in WebIDL/ecmascript-binding/es-exceptions that's sort of similar, or we could add things directly under WebIDL/ecmascript-binding, right? And yes, issues on UAs would be good. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/220#issuecomment-258201278
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 16:46:44 UTC